Contents:
The Kingston drive gets warm after a few minutes of file transfers, but never too hot to touch. Because production issues can result in the oddball slow flash drive now and again, we recommend testing your drive as soon as you get it by copying a few files over. If the speeds seem slower than our tests, return it to the retailer while you can.
A tethered cap would solve this problem. If you care more about size or you need a small, semi-permanent drive that can stay plugged into a computer, get the GB Samsung Fit Plus. Take a look at the Extreme Go, below. The Fit Plus is a few millimeters larger than most thumbnail drives, which are usually around the size of the USB dongle included with some wireless mice. Samsung offers the same five-year warranty period as Kingston. If you frequently move large files between computers and need more storage space than our top pick, get the GB SanDisk Extreme Go. It had the fastest write speeds of the GB drives we tested, and quick read speeds, too.
In real-world tests, the Extreme Go had the fastest write speeds of the GB drives we tested, making it ideal for transferring large files between computers. But its retractable design is handy, and the USB connector slides in and out and locks into place with a satisfying click. Still, I accidentally retracted it when plugging the drive into a port because my thumb naturally pressed down on the sliding button.
It's no false marketing. Thumbs up. Finally, USB flash drives are ideal for expanding the limited storage space you tend to get on budget laptops. Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. If you frequently move large files between computers and need more storage space than our top pick, get the GB SanDisk Extreme Go. If you need to move around large files quickly, then this is definitely worth the price.
Like the DataTraveler, the Extreme Go has an indicator light that blinks when the drive is active. The Extreme Go also has a handy keychain loop, like our other picks. For our update, we looked at a handful of newer drives. The SanDisk Extreme Go 64 GB was our previous runner-up, but in this round of testing we found inconsistent results in our small file write tests. Even when reformatting the drive between every test, we had the same problem on multiple Windows computers and a Mac.
We purchased and tested a second drive in case the first was a lemon but got the same results.
We have not heard of other performance issues from customer care, which leads us to believe that this is an isolated issue. Both the 64 GB and GB models of the SanDisk Ultra Flair had mediocre speeds in our tests around half the speed of their competitors , and their plastic cases felt cheap. The Bar Plus comes in a durable metal case, but we found the connectors were a smidge too large for most USB ports, which meant we had to really cram the drives in.
Caring for your Flash Memory , Kingston Technology. Mike Wuerthele, Examined: Thunderbolt 3 and USB 3. Sign up for our weekly newsletter Be the first to know about our latest recommendations every Sunday.
Also great. The SanDisk Ultra Flair is a smaller alternative for users who want swiftness and simplicity. In our tests, the Ultra Flair read files at an impressive Available in sleek titanium blue and gray, this aluminum flash drive offers decent performance, returning rates of Adata also provides a lifetime warranty for the Elite S Pro and a few free software downloads. With an exterior made from sturdy red-and-black plastic, the Cruzer Blade is durable enough to be thrown in a bag with little worry, even without a cap.
For a flash drive that has the slower USB 2. The key ring doubles as a snap-on cap holder to prevent loss while the flash drive is in use. However, the DataTraveler provides underwhelming performance. In our tests, the DataTraveler read files at These numbers were surprising from a flash drive optimized for USB 3. Measuring 0. Not having much real estate, the design is minimalistic, sporting only a metal male USB 3. Did you test any of these or just took from their websites? You've got it right Some people in the comments make false claims based on their own experience about the speed of these drives, most of them being dissapointed.
What they fail to understand is that in most situations their hardware cant keep up with the speed of these drives reading from busy HDD, fragmented, etc , they plug it on USB 2. Don't blame the usb drive lol. I saw your site and ordered Sandisk Extreme 64GB. Falsely advertised from Sandisk. Huge disappointment: You have probably put it in a usb 2. Try putting it in a usb 3. If not then maybe your testing is off.
It's definitely not false advertising, it will be your human error. I have one and it runs around mbs read. You are quoting READ speeds. Read speeds are always faster. Then there also CAN be other issues with this drive. Notice emphasis on the word "CAN". This article contradicts the SanDisk site.
Though in stating this, one should always to remember to take care of the software eg: I own many of them, they rock! I have the same Sandisk Extrerme but in the 32GB. And NO! We are NOT idiots as was inferred to you by Anonymous. I only use my USB3. I also have the XtremeKey 64GB. They use more "stripes" in 64GB model, aka when writing a block of data, it is split into more chunks which are written in parallel. Write performance is also strongly dependent on operating system and file system you use. In Windows, NTFS filesystem is the usual choice and this is not the best performing filesystem available.
Also, Windows uses synchronous mode on external media by default. Synchronous mode updates filesystem journal more frequently, so when writing data to the USB key, metadata is updated very frequently, so in fact apart from what user expects, system writes more data data about data behind the scenes, which causes slowdown. In real life, one copies mixture of big files and plenty of small ones, so actual average perfromance will be a bit slower.
Journalling and synchornous writes slow the operation down. I observed that the same flash key is much faster when writing under macintosh then in windows holds true with Sandisk Extreme 32GB as well. So many silly comments.
They are typically exFAT in this capacity and larger. Strangely, your hot link takes me to an Amazon page for a Sandisk usb 2. Should stay away from it like a plague then. How about looking at Sandisk's actual test data and compared to many others. If you posted in Jan that Sandisk 64GB is "fastest"; there were many that were 'way' faster than sandisk!
Sorry to burst your bubble. I have used USB 3. I donno.. Still no Sign- its March now.